Tort Reform Is Early Priority for Gov. Corbett

For the past several years PAMED has worked relentlessly to educate lawmakers of the need for tort reform, and the coming year may provide an opportunity for those efforts to pay off.

Even before this month’s swearing-in ceremony was complete, the new Corbett administration had made it clear that tort reforms would be a priority early in the session.

PAMED’s short-term medical liability goals include:

  • Limits on plaintiffs’ attorney fees
  • An apology law prohibiting apologies by physicians to injured patients from being used in court
  • Requiring the expert report supporting a Certificate of Merit to be filed concurrently with the filing of the complaint in medical liability actions
  • Increased liability protections for physicians who provide emergency room services and uncompensated care

PAMED is part of a large tort reform coalition working to enact meaningful tort reform.  The Coalition is made up of many of the state’s business, health care and insurance interests. As a member of the coalition, the Pennsylvania Business Council is planning to host a summit on Feb. 1, 2011, in Harrisburg to kick-off the coalition’s tort reform campaign. PAMED leaders plan to participate in the summit.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 4


The certificate of merit is a useless provision unless the certifier has to indicate how the defendant actually deviated from standard. As it is there is no denial of a certificate ever becasue the certifier has absolutely no accountabilty. Any new tort refor should put some teeth into the certificate of merit so that so called certifiers can't just collect a fee for certifying non meritorious cases. The unethical certification of merit for profit is unethecal and very common.

anonymous at 1/23/2011 7:56:11 PM


I believe. Certificates of Merit should be public documents

RL Knobler at 1/21/2011 11:27:28 PM


thanks about time

anonymous at 1/21/2011 1:03:51 PM


Requiring "experts" on both sides to be vetted would add to the validity of testimony in court. Preventing plaintiff attorneys from having their clients tutored by professionals would also be of use.

Saul R. Berg,M.D. at 1/20/2011 2:59:45 PM

Last Updated: 1/20/2011
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: