PAMED Supports Proceeding with Statewide Health Information Exchange

Pennsylvania needs a statewide health information exchange (HIE) because it would benefit physicians, patients, and the community at large, according to Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED) president Ralph Schmeltz, MD, in testimony to the Senate Communications and Technology Committee on March 2, 2011.

Some legislators had questioned whether the state should proceed with the development of a statewide HIE. Opponents questioned how it would improve patient care, keep patient information safe and secure, be financially sustainable, and meet standards to ensure appropriate use by providers.

Dr. Schmeltz said that PAMED unequivocally supports development of a statewide HIE that would open the door for better health in Pennsylvania. “Given our conviction that such technology can save lives and improve care, our Board of Trustees adopted as policy our commitment to seeing a statewide HIE becoming a reality,” he said.

According to Dr. Schmeltz, the benefits of an HIE system are three-fold:

  1. Access to organized data at the point of care and the ability to generate reports to allow physicians to look at their practices in innovative ways
  2. Better care coordination between physicians, better record-keeping and more quality time with patients during their appointments
  3. Consistent, readily accessible patient data from every health insurer

“A statewide HIE would be a wise investment for the health of all Pennsylvanians,” concluded Dr. Schmeltz.

Attendees called the hearing one of the most informative and useful in their memory, with the audience breaking out in applause at the hearing’s conclusion.

Among those who testified at the hearing were representatives of the eHealth Initiative, Guthrie Health Care System, Geisinger Health System, Lancaster General Health, Lehigh Valley Health Network, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 4


This is just another ay for insureres and government to have access to all our patient records. I for one do not wish anybody to have access to my patients medical records without me or them being aware. The result, as always, is that I am the liable party if information is seen that a patient does not want to be seen!!!!!!

anonymous at 3/28/2011 8:10:24 AM


This is the most intelligent thing I've heard from the legislature. Rather than individual practices and hospitals instituting electronic medical record systems that can't communicate with each other, a statewide, or better yet nationwide, system that individuals could join would better serve the intent of EMRs.

anonymous at 3/27/2011 10:12:08 AM


Thanks for sharing your concerns regarding the management of the database. The data must have the highest level of accuracy and reliability. The Society believes that physician access to this information will ultimately lead to more efficient and better care for their patients.

PA Medical Society at 3/22/2011 3:16:56 PM


I am concerned about the accurateness of any information placed in such a large database. As I review charts, perform consults, etc I see a clear "telephone" effect and compounding of inaccurate info. I can control my own charts, how and by whom will such a large data base be controlled????

beo at 3/21/2011 6:39:38 PM

Last Updated: 4/13/2011
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: